Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.
The NY Times brings up Obama's Muslim birth...yes the NY Times!
By Jaded Posted in Liberals — Comments (5) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I must say my first reaction was shock and than my second was "they want to hash this out now"...I am sure that the NY Times oped page would not go with this opinion if not to get it out of the way for the general election.
From the NY Times article:
"But it is a mistake to conflate his African identity with his Muslim heritage. Senator Obama is half African by birth and Africans can understandably identify with him. In Islam, however, there is no such thing as a half-Muslim. Like all monotheistic religions, Islam is an exclusive faith."
I have to say for all of their articles about race and the articles about Obama's middle name where they were appalled at such trivial claptrap that they themselves would be so blunt in their words....what they say is true....but do they believe it to be true?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=1&partner=rs...
So if the Iranian "Parliament" passes that law making conversion away from Islam a crime punishable by death, what happens when Barry shows up in Tehran for "talks" with the midget dictator? He better have a healthy VP.
Other than to note that this is another reason for Obama not to choose Hillary as his VP.
Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
They should care
by kowalskiI understand that very well
by kowalskiCHARLOTTE OBSERVER HAS GREAT STORIES ON HELMS
by gamecockgood points - nt
by gamecockgc recommended - more later - nt
by gamecockThe taxpayers don't care.
by AchanceDon't go knocking on those doors, in other words
by kowalskiAnd by the way....it's all perfectly legal
by kowalskiReally?
by shooflyguy68I don't doubt it....
by kowalskiyes nt
by dglennAdd in support for tariffs on Brazilian sugar ethanol
by shooflyguy68Doubt they'd qualify as "minority" other
by AchanceI wouldn't be at all surprised, for example
by kowalski
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Thus, the publishing of this article doesn't indicate any shift regarding the NYT and Obama. How the NYT editors will respond remains to be seen: perhaps they've orchestrated this as the first act in a theater production, or perhaps they will simply surf on the waves of reader response. Or perhaps they'll content themselves with an editorial response and a rebuttal columnist.
And Rightly So!